Page 13 - 2016-Issue3
P. 13

FATIGUE MANAGEMENT 13


















           n early 2015, IFALPA, ICAO and IATA
         Ireleased an updated version of the
         co-branded Fatigue Risk Management Systems   Definition of Terms
         Implementation Guide for Operators. This   •  FTL (Flight Time Limitations) - often used to define the prescriptive approach, also
         new version includes more than just guidance   encompasses basic flight and duty regulations.
         on Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS).   •  FM (Fatigue Management) - In the newest of regulations, it is a mandatory method
         It includes appropriate methods to mitigate   to look at fatigue risks more holistically; in essence, ensures that fatigue hazards are
         pilot fatigue via a prescriptive approach and   managed using the SMS processes that are in place for managing other types of
         develop a path to better mitigate fatigue with a   hazards.
         data-driven, risk-based, approach. This new
         version is titled Fatigue Management Guide for   •  FRMS (Fatigue Risk Management System) - A data-driven means of continuously
         Airline Operators. This manual is available on   monitoring and managing fatigue-related safety risks, based on scientific principles,
         IFALPA’s, ICAO’s and IATA’s web pages, and   knowledge and operational experience that aims to ensure relevant personnel are
         you are encouraged to download and distribute   performing at adequate levels of alertness.
         it as needed.
            The purpose of this article is to provide a
         basic introduction of the prescriptive approach
         to flight and duty time regulations and then
         apply a Safety Management Systems (SMS)
         driven approach to Fatigue Management (FM).
         This will then build the foundation on how
         one can introduce Fatigue Risk Management
         Systems (FRMS), as desired or needed, to
         enhance FTL and effectively mitigate fatigue
         and enhance alertness. To properly paint this
         picture, it is important to recognize that the
         management of safety risks is evolving into a
         data-driven, risk-based approach, rather than
         a prescriptive, carrot and stick, approach. Since
         pilot fatigue is one of many safety risks   Figure 1
         associated with the profession, to be truly
         effective, and in some regards innovative, one   •  The circadian body clock affects the   the same manner as other hazards in the
         has to accept that the “traditional” prescriptive   timing and quality of sleep and produces   organization. In the most recent rulemaking
         approach does not provide a complete solution   daily highs and lows in performance on   efforts in North America and Europe, this
         in the quest to minimize pilot fatigue.   various tasks.                 process  is  specifically  defined  and  is
            Before moving beyond a basic prescriptive   •  Workload can contribute to an individual’s   mandatory for all airline operators operating
         approach, it is a requirement to have an ICAO   level of fatigue. Low workload may   under US FAR or EASA rules (e.g. InFO
         compliant prescriptive approach based on   unmask physiological sleepiness while   10013, FRMP and ORO.FTL.110, Fatigue
         scientific principles established in one’s   high workload may exceed the capacity of   Management).
         respective country. These scientific principles   a fatigued individual.    While moving to a broader FM approach is
         are:                                                                     still accomplished under a prescriptive ruleset;
                                              Referring to Figure 1, the basic prescriptive
           •  Getting enough sleep (both quantity and   approach is somewhat restrictive in what it can   using the SMS process has the potential to take
             quality) on a regular basis as it is essential   accomplish and has no additional obligations   the first steps in “type of operation” flexibility.
             for restoring the brain and body.   for the operator except complying with a set   Although less restrictive from a regulatory
           •  Reducing the amount or the quality of   value in the regulation. Once an ICAO   perspective, this approach will be more
                                                                                  comprehensive from a fatigue risk perspective
             sleep, even for a single night, decreases the   compliant prescriptive  scheme  is in place,   as the operator will have to identify hazards,
             ability to function and increases sleepiness   Safety Management Systems (SMS) processes   limit the operation due to those identified
             the next day.                    can be applied to manage fatigue hazards in
         InterPilot | The Safety and Technical Journal of IFALPA                                               ISSue 3 | 2016
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16