Page 31 - InterPilot 2019 Issue 3
P. 31

PAGE 30  IFALPA@ICAO  IFALPA@ICAO                                                                         PAGE 31


 do prediction and awareness of en-route   the operations. An example is the ATMOPSP
 wake vortex to pilots and controllers. It was   believing the Loss C2 Link is just a communi-
 noted that there are not enough reports of   cations failure, when the C2 link encompasses   completed and it remains to finalize the
 this issue and although there were report-  much more than just communications, and so   guidance material. Work has been started
 ing systems (ICAO and others) for en-route   needs to be classified as an emergency.  on amendments to the Aerodrome Design
 wake vortex encounters (and other incidents)   Manual.
 they are not widely used or known to Pilots   PERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGNATION STUDY
 and operators.  The new RECAT system was   GROUP (PBNSG)/25  There was an update from the Wildlife
 discussed and it was mentioned that there   This was primarily another editorial meeting   Hazard Management Expert Group (WH-
 appears to be a discrepancy between EURO-  to try and complete the rewrite of the PBN   MEG) and it was agreed that there is a
 CONTROL/EASA and the FAA as to how to   manual. Nearly 600 comments were reviewed   need to work on a standardized taxonomy
 deal with airplanes that do not have a RECAT   and validated by the two editorial working   of what should be reported as wildlife
 category yet (for example, those in the certi-  groups, ATM and Functions.    strikes.
 fication process), or have 2 categories in Doc
 8463.  The schedule for completing this rewrite has   There were discussions concerning the
 now slipped and there will be a further review   need for a risk-based approach for autho-
 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS   of the document at the November meeting   rized UAS and protecting airports from
 PANEL (RPASP)  in Cologne. From there, it will be sent out to   unauthorized UAS and how to address this
 This was the second of three Panel meetings   various ICAO Panels (NSP/SASP/ATMOPSP/  serious issue. Other discussions included
 planned for this year. The contents of Work-  FLTOPSP/IFPP) for comment between 01 De-  proposed amendments to Annex 14 relat-
 ing Paper 3 dominated the meeting. ICAO has  cember 2019 and 31 January 2020. The final   ing to Taxiway lighting requirements for
 adopted a policy limiting panels and commit-  meeting in March will complete the docu-  CAT II operations below 350m, various
 tees to not more than one meeting per year.   ment and any further meetings will be deter-  lighting requirements, providing guidance
 This will potentially have a significant impact   mined by ICAO after that date.  for converting a taxiway into a standby
 on the work of the RPAS Panel (RPASP) and   runway and the progress on the develop-
 its delivery of SARPs, Procedures, and guid-  PERSONNEL TRAINING AND LICENSING EX-  ment of the Heliport Manual.
 ance material. The revised proposal from the   PLORATORY MEETING (PTL EM)
 Panel will be for one formal meeting, such as   ICAO convened a group of experts in an   OBSTACLE LIMITATION SURFACE TASK
 a Panel Meeting, to be held in March of each   exploratory meeting regarding personnel   FORCE (OLSTF)
 year and then an informal meeting, such as   training and licensing the week of July 8. The   The Task Force continues to review the
 a Working Group of the Whole (WGWHL),   Personnel Training and Licensing Exploratory   current Obstacle Limitation Surfaces (OLS)
 to be held in the October/November period   meeting (PTL EM) was held as a direct re-  and has proposals on revised surfaces that
 each year. Regardless of if the proposal is   sponse to the concerns raised by States and   would reflect the type of operations and
 approved, the deadlines for all the work on   International Organizations on amendment   aircraft in use today. In addition, as the
 the SARPS and guidance material will now be   proposals distributed in State Letter 2018/77   new surfaces; Obstacle Free Surface (OFS)
 delayed considerably. At best, there will be a   to Annex 1 and PANS TRG. A number of is-  and Obstacle Evaluation Surface (OES) will
 two-year delay, making it 2026, but it is pos-  sues were withdrawn from that State Letter   require an Aeronautical Study. The Task
 sible there may be a four to five-year delay.  and marked for future work as well as other   Force has now developed a full description
 items that have been in the same domain.   of an Aeronautical Study and how it will be
 Work continued in the working groups devel-  The objective of the PTL EM was to determine   conducted.
 oping Standards and Recommended Prac-  the scope of the subjects needing develop-
 tices (SARPS) and guidance material for the   ment by an expert group in training and   The package of the proposed changes to
 integration of international IFR operations by   licensing, and to make those recommenda-  the Standards and Recommended Prac-
 Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPAs).  tions to the ANC to determine what kind of   tices (SARPs) and guidance material will
 group would best satisfy those needs. There   be submitted for Aerodrome Design and
 Working Group 5 is the Operations Group   were about 45 experts from several State   Operations Panel (ADOP) and (Instrument
 and IFALPA assisted in the work to con-  Regulatory agencies, International Organiza-  Flight Procedures Panel) IFPP’s endorse-
 vert the existing Part IV to Annex 6 into the   tions, and the ICAO Secretariat.   ment in the third quarter of 2021, and sub-
 required format as requested by the ICAO   mission to the Air Navigation Commission
 Secretariat. This is now broadly aligned with   Design and Operations Working Group   (ANC) by no later than the first quarter of
 Annex 6 Part I. It is a long process and only   (ADOP/WG)  2022 for the SARPs to be effective by 2024.
 the first four chapters have been completed.   IFALPA was called upon to comment on   Instead of the usual two years applicability
 The next meeting will hopefully see the other   several papers during this busy meeting.   date, the Task Force has suggested that,
 chapters completed. In the meantime, the   The Standards and Recommended Practices   in order for the States to make changes to
 WG will look at what is needed in the form of   (SARPS) for the Standardized taxiway nam-  any zoning laws and legislation, that the
 Appendices and Attachments. There is con-  ing convention presented by Airports Council   applicability date should be 2028.
 cern with ensuring other Panels understand   International (ACI) and IFALPA have been
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33