Page 21 - InterPilot 2018, Issue 4
P. 21

FOUNDING MA: ALPA CANADA  PAGE 20  FOUNDING MA: ALPA CANADA                                                PAGE 21









 “I wonder what our IFALPA founders   They would surely point to the South


 would think of our progress on the   American and Central American busi-
        ness models and States that continue
        to attack professional pilots who stand
 top-of-mind issues of 1948?”   up for basic rights and workplace dig-
        nity such as in Colombia. They would
        ask why we have continued to accept,
        tolerate, and abide by professional pi-
        lots being made a piece of the airlines
        competitive cost calculus.

        Captain Robinson and the other IFAL-
        PA founders faced significant issues in
        1948. At the top of the list were safety
        issues, followed by everything else and
        had a vision that began with the Mu-
        tual Aid pact between BALPA, CALPA                           The large group of CALPA delegates at the Second IFALPA Conference in Paris, 1948
        and ALPA in April 1943 and blossomed
        into the founding IFALPA Conference
        in 1948. I like to think that the hope
 Our  CALPA and  ALPA fore-  each Association  should  puzzled as to why we have  point to, especially since de-  and promise that IFALPA held in April
 fathers as well as the other  adopt  a  seniority  scheme  not embraced other  alter-  regulation began in the late   1948 is still burning, but we need to
 IFALPA founders were  also  which  suited its particular  natives to seniority and pay  1970’s. They would point   redouble our efforts to stir that flame
 concerned  with the  issues  requirements.”  systems that tend to isolate  to the example of the East-  into a real blaze again. I imagine him
 around  seniority.  Cap-  and divide pilots.  ern pilots being crushed by   telling me that anything  worth  do-
 tain Robinson had this to  It is clear from Captain Rob-  Frank Lorenzo and all of us   ing is hard and that we need to, like
 say, “Tuesday’s proceed-  inson’s  reporting  of the  I think they  would  wonder  helplessly standing by. They   him and his colleagues in 1948, place
 ings were opened by Capt.  founding  Conference  that  why we have not designed  would point to the rise of   trust in each  other,  treat  each other
 Griffiths of the United King-  the IFALPA founders were  more  effective  means  to  the transnational and  low-  as equals no matter what you fly, who
 dom who  introduced  the  also concerned  with la-  ensure  that  the  world’s  pi-  cost carrier business models   you fly for, or where you fly.
 subject of seniority and it  bour  issues and  how  they  lots  are  able  to  effectively  in Europe  and Asia espe-
 was obvious from the dis-  impacted  the  world’s  pi-  advocate  for each other.  cially,  to  the  division and   At ALPA Canada, despite the challeng-
 cussion which followed that  lots. How would our IFALPA  They  might be surprised  uncertainty  it has created   es  ahead for IFALPA and the worlds’
 here is one of the most con-  founders view our progress  that  we  have  been  unable  for the pilots in that region.   pilots, we still feel the same optimism
 troversial  topics in the  in-  in this area?  to  mitigate  the  effects  of  They would point to recent   that Captain Robinson felt 70 years
 ternational  air  line piloting   deregulation that happened  examples such as Air Ber-  ago in London. He put it this way:
 picture…….  Capt.  Griffiths  I would  submit that  they  decades  ago  and  business  lin and ask if there was not
 proposed  various  radical  might be disappointed and  models and State regulators  more that  we  could do  for   “All in all, the Conference was an im-
 departures from the senior-  might even give us a fail-  and States themselves  that  those pilots?  mense success. The groundwork  has
 ity system as we know it in  ing grade.  I would say this  would  oppress  pilots and   been laid for an organization that will
 Canada,  among which was  because  they  would  mea-  pilot unions. They would  They  would  point to the   play an increasingly important part in
 a national list which  would  sure our success,  again,  by  understand  that  these are  Capacity Purchase Business   the world of aviation……If the mutual
 permit a pilot to move from  the data and  by our  per-  very  significant  battles  but  model and the deleterious   trust, free exchange of ideas, single-
 one Company to another  formance.  I imagine  they  would be perplexed at why  effects  that  has  had  on  pi-  ness of purpose and  spirit of cama-
 and still  retain  his accu-  would ask why  we have  more resources were  not  lots’  careers  and pitting   raderie that prevailed throughout the
 mulated  seniority.  It  was  been unable to take our  devoted to “getting into the  pilots against pilots. They   first  Conference  are  any  criterion---I
 generally agreed,  however,  unity and  exercise it more  arena” and challenging our-  would surely ask  how it is   can see nothing but the utmost in suc-  Excerpt from article by CALPA President, Captain C.R. Robinson, International Conference of Pilots
 that  seniority was  one  of  effectively.  They  might  ask  selves,  management,  and  possible  that unionized pi-  cess for  the  International  Federation   Associations, in the July 1948 issue of The Canadian Air Line Pilot Magazine.
 the most difficult problems  why we decided to use the  States.  lot groups are compelled   of Air Line Pilots’ Associations.”
 confronting  pilots  and a  same bargaining model that   to climb all over each oth-
 resolution was unanimously  we have been using since  We  know  that  they  would  er to secure work from the
 carried  to  the  effect  that  the 1930’s. They might be  have  many  examples to  “mainline” carrier.
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26