Page 17 - InterPilot Issue 1 2016
P. 17

ICAO SARP DevelOPment 101 17












































         Montreal to increase our effectiveness in   Secretariat Task Forces (TF) or Study Groups   International Industry Observers). As the
         ICAO. Our increased involvement in the daily   (SG). IFALPA has a panel member on 15 of   IFALPA Representative to ICAO, I have the
         activities at ICAO proved to be very effective   these panels and a number of representatives   responsibility to ensure IFALPA policy and
         and by 2012, the entire IFALPA operation had   on the TF/SGs. That representative is a   positions are integrated into each new SARP
         crossed the Atlantic with the exception of one   committee member from one of our Standing   that comes before the ANC and this
         European based Technical Officer, Captain   Committees with the full backing of resources   “preliminary review process” is the last
         Arnaud du Bédat, who continues close   in the IFALPA Standing Committee structure   opportunity to do that before the proposals go
         cooperation with ICAO Paris and our   and the Technical Team. This is our best   out for State comment via State Letter. When it
         European member associations in addition to   opportunity to influence the development of a   comes to safety and technical issues, IFALPA’s
         his Technical Officer responsibilities. Montreal   SARP with our unique operational perspective   viewpoints are well respected and sought after,
         today is host to the largest international   from its very beginning in the formal and   so despite having observer status (as are all of
         aviation community in the world in which   informal panel discussions. The panel member   Industry), our input is well received.
         IFALPA has the opportunity to interact with all   draws from IFALPA policies, positions, and   The next  opportunity for input from
         the major stakeholders on a daily basis.  his/her own expertise as an operational line   IFALPA is via the State Letter commenting
            With all of IFALPA’s resources now in   pilot to ensure they speak for the Global Voice   period where a well-coordinated response to
         Montreal, our opportunity to influence the   of Pilots. Quite often our panel members are   all relevant State letters is drafted. The drafting
         development of ICAO SARPs and guidance   accompanied by their relevant technical officer   of these responses comes from multiple
         material has greatly expanded. We work issues   to ensure our tech staff is fully in the loop on   resources which include the relevant Executive
         from the bottom up and get involved at the   the issues. The latter consideration is essential   Board member(s), Standing Committee
         earliest stages following the issues through the   so that our Tech team can work with ICAO   Chairmen,  Technical  Officer(s), committee
         multi-layered process to the end when the   informally  between  meetings  as  they  have   SMEs, existing IFALPA policy or positions,
         SARPs are implemented to include guidance   developed working relations with the ICAO   and the Rep to ICAO. It is the response to the
         material.                            Secretariat.  This  initial  phase may take a   State Letter that forms the basis for any
            Safety and Technical issues are brought to   considerable amount of time (including years)   IFALPA interventions during the last phase of
         ICAO through a variety of sources, including   before an issue is mature enough to be put into   SARP development.
         IFALPA. When an issue is identified that has   a draft amendment proposal, hence it is   The final chance for IFALPA input into the
         an effect on the global pilot community, we   essential that we consistently send the same   SARP development process takes place in a
         approach it from many angles. It is first worked   pilot representative to the panel meetings.  final review of the proposals before the ANC.
         through one of ICAO’s 17 panels of the Air   When the proposals are mature, they come   This chance is very limited in that no major
         Navigation Commission (ANC), the Aviation   to the ANC where IFALPA has one of two   changes can take place without going through
         Security Panel (AVSECP), or any of the   permanent observer seats (there are a total of 8   the entire process all over again, but it is used
         InterPilot | The Safety and Technical Journal of IFALPA                                               ISSue 1 | 2016
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20